March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025
Optimize compute, storage and data
Choose copilot or autopilot execution
Continuously improve with reinforcement learning
Running workloads on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) offers incredible flexibility, scalability, and the ability to manage complex, containerized applications. However, with this freedom comes the challenge of cost management. As workloads scale, the associated costs can quickly spiral, particularly if the resources aren’t optimally configured.
Understanding how to optimize for cost in GKE is crucial for businesses looking to achieve efficient cloud operations without compromising performance or scalability. Without a solid cost optimization strategy, organizations risk overspending on unused resources, inefficient autoscaling, and underutilized virtual machines (VMs).
By optimizing GKE costs, you not only reduce unnecessary expenditures but also free up valuable resources for other areas of your business. Efficient cloud cost management ensures that your Kubernetes deployments are running as economically as possible while still maintaining the performance required to support your operations.
With various pricing models, including pay-as-you-go, committed use discounts, and spot VMs, there are many ways to reduce cloud expenses and make sure you're getting the most out of every dollar spent.
In the following sections, we'll explore effective strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE, including choosing the right VM types, utilizing autoscaling features, and leveraging cloud discounts, all while maintaining a smooth, efficient Kubernetes environment.
Link: Best practices for running cost-optimized Kubernetes applications on GKE
One of the most effective ways to optimize costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is by adjusting the Pod requests and limits. These settings determine the amount of CPU and memory resources that Kubernetes allocates for each container. Misconfigured requests and limits can lead to underutilization of resources or, conversely, cause excessive over-provisioning, both of which can inflate your GKE costs.
Here’s a detailed approach on how to adjust these settings for better cost efficiency:
The first step in optimizing Pod resources is updating the Kubernetes deployment YAML files, which define the resource allocation for your containers. By refining the requests and limits, you ensure that GKE can more accurately allocate the resources your workloads need.
The resources field within the YAML file defines these parameters. Specifically, the requests field determines the amount of CPU and memory Kubernetes will reserve for a container, while the limits field sets the maximum allowable amount of CPU and memory.
For example:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app-container
image: my-app-image
resources:
requests:
memory: "500Mi"
cpu: "500m"
limits:
memory: "1Gi"
cpu: "1"
In this configuration, Kubernetes will reserve 500Mi of memory and 500m (0.5 CPUs) for the container, but the container will be able to use up to 1Gi of memory and 1 CPU if necessary.
To effectively optimize costs in GKE, fine-tuning these resource requests and limits based on actual usage is key. Here are some best practices for adjusting these settings:
Consider an example where an application initially had the following resource requests and limits:
yaml
resources:
requests:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "1"
limits:
memory: "3Gi"
cpu: "2"
After analyzing resource usage, you notice that the application typically uses about 1.5Gi of memory and 0.75 CPU. Based on this observation, you can reduce the request and limit values as follows:
yaml
resources:
requests:
memory: "1.5Gi"
cpu: "0.75"
limits:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "1.5"
This adjustment reflects the actual usage of the application, thus helping you avoid over-provisioning while still ensuring the application runs smoothly.
Manual adjustments can work, but the dynamic nature of workloads often makes it difficult to maintain the right balance over time. This is where Sedai comes into play. Sedai is a cloud cost optimization platform that can autonomously adjust Kubernetes resource allocations based on real-time demand, eliminating the need for constant manual intervention.
By integrating Sedai with your GKE environment, you introduce AI-driven autonomy to the adjustment of pod requests and limits. Sedai continuously monitors usage and adjusts resources intelligently, ensuring that your GKE workloads always use the optimal amount of CPU and memory without under or over-provisioning.
With Sedai’s ability to automatically scale and adjust resource allocations in real time, you can ensure that your GKE costs remain optimized while maintaining the performance and availability of your applications. This level of autonomy significantly reduces the risk of human error and ensures that your infrastructure adapts to the fluctuating needs of your workload.
Autoscaling is one of the most effective ways to optimize costs in GKE, ensuring you only use the resources you need at any given time. Without autoscaling, workloads can be over-provisioned, leading to unnecessary cloud expenses or under-provisioned, causing performance issues.
By implementing autoscaling, you can dynamically adjust the number of pods, their resource allocations, and the overall cluster size based on real-time demand. Below are the key autoscaling mechanisms available in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and how they help optimize costs.
GKE provides three primary types of autoscaling to manage workload resource consumption efficiently:
Each of these autoscaling mechanisms plays a crucial role in ensuring that your cluster scales appropriately without wasting cloud resources.
HPA automatically increases or decreases the number of pods in a deployment based on CPU or other utilization metrics. This prevents idle resources from running unnecessarily while ensuring that applications scale up when demand increases.
You can configure HPA using the following command:
sh
kubectl autoscale deployment my-app --cpu-percent=50 --min=1 --max=10
This command configures autoscaling for a deployment named my-app, adjusting the number of pods between 1 and 10 based on CPU utilization (targeting 50% usage).
VPA optimizes the CPU and memory requests of pods by analyzing historical usage patterns. Instead of scaling the number of pods, it adjusts resource allocations within existing pods.
VPA can be enabled using the following command:
sh
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/deploy/vpa-v1-crd-gen.yaml
Once enabled, it automatically adjusts pod resource requests based on real-time and historical usage.
Unlike HPA and VPA, which manage pod-level scaling, Cluster Autoscaler (CA) ensures that your cluster always has the right number of nodes to run workloads. If there are unscheduled pods due to resource constraints, CA automatically provisions new nodes. Conversely, it removes underutilized nodes to cut costs.
Use the following command to enable Cluster Autoscaler:
sh
gcloud container clusters update my-cluster \
--enable-autoscaling \
--min-nodes=1 \
--max-nodes=5 \
--node-pool my-node-pool
This command configures the cluster my-cluster to scale between 1 and 5 nodes based on resource demand.
While HPA, VPA, and CA provide excellent autoscaling capabilities, manual configurations can still leave room for inefficiencies. Sedai takes autoscaling to the next level by introducing autonomous optimization, ensuring that workloads and clusters are always at their most efficient state.
By integrating Sedai, organizations can achieve autonomous scaling, eliminating the need for constant manual tuning and ensuring that GKE resources are used efficiently at all times.
Link: How to optimize cloud costs with Committed Use Discounts for Compute Engine
One of the most effective strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE is to take advantage of Google Cloud’s pricing models and discounts. By aligning your workloads with the right cost-saving options, you can significantly reduce cloud expenses without compromising performance. GKE offers multiple ways to optimize pricing, including Committed Use Discounts (CUDs), Spot Virtual Machines (Spot VMs), and Sustained Use Discounts (SUDs).
Let’s break down these options and explore how you can maximize cost savings.
Google Cloud’s Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) allow businesses to commit to using a certain amount of compute resources for a 1- or 3-year period in exchange for significant discounts. Unlike pay-as-you-go pricing, where you pay for resources based on actual usage, CUDs offer predictable, lower costs for businesses with steady workloads.
There are two types of CUDs:
While CUDs provide substantial savings, they lack flexibility—if your computing requirements change, you may end up paying for unused capacity.
This is where Sedai’s autonomous cost optimization can help. By analyzing workload demand patterns, Sedai can dynamically adjust usage and ensure you maximize CUD benefits without overcommitting.
For workloads that don’t require high availability, Spot Virtual Machines (Spot VMs) provide an opportunity to save up to 60-91% compared to standard VM pricing. Spot VMs use Google’s spare cloud capacity, making them highly cost-effective for non-critical, fault-tolerant workloads.
Considerations before using Spot VMs:
Spot VMs are an excellent choice for cost-conscious teams looking to run batch processing, data analytics, or AI/ML training while keeping expenses low.
Sustained Use Discounts (SUDs) provide automatic savings for running compute resources continuously over a billing cycle. The longer your workloads run, the greater the discount you receive on incremental usage.
How Sustained Use Discounts work:
Link: Why separate your Kubernetes workload with nodepool segregation and affinity options
Node pools play a crucial role in managing Kubernetes workloads efficiently, and optimizing their configuration is key to reducing unnecessary costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). If node pools are not properly managed, organizations often face resource wastage, underutilized nodes, and inflated cloud bills. By optimizing node pool management, you can significantly improve resource allocation, reduce spending, and maintain performance.
In this section, we’ll explore strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE by configuring node pools effectively.
A single, uniform node pool for all workloads often results in resource wastage. Instead, creating multiple node pools based on workload characteristics helps optimize cost and resource allocation.
Best practices for managing multiple node pools:
Example node pool creation command:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create high-memory-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=n2-highmem-4 \
--num-nodes=2
This command creates a node pool with high-memory nodes for workloads that need additional RAM, preventing memory shortages and improving performance.
When configuring node pools, selecting the right instance types and sizing them appropriately is key to controlling costs. GKE offers various machine types under different families, each optimized for different workloads.
Key configuration options to optimize cost:
For example, you can create a cost-efficient node pool using E2 instances:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create cost-efficient-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=e2-standard-4 \
--num-nodes=3
By selecting the right node configurations, you ensure that workloads get precisely the resources they need—without overpaying for unnecessary computing power.
Preemptible Virtual Machines (PVMs) provide up to 91% savings compared to regular Compute Engine VMs. These temporary instances are ideal for batch jobs, non-critical workloads, and applications that can tolerate interruptions.
Example command to create a node pool with preemptible VMs:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create preemptible-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=e2-standard-2 \
--num-nodes=5 \
--preemptible
This configuration ensures that GKE will automatically scale these lower-cost instances up and down based on demand, keeping costs under control.
Important Considerations:
While manually optimizing node pools can yield cost savings, it often requires continuous monitoring and adjustments. This is where Sedai’s autonomous optimization can take cost management to the next level.
By integrating Sedai, organizations can eliminate inefficiencies in node pool management, reduce manual efforts, and optimize GKE costs proactively.
To Know More: Kubernetes Cost: EKS vs AKS vs GKE
Link: Use GKE usage metering to combat over-provisioning
Effective GKE cost optimization relies on more than just adjusting resource requests and limits—it requires a continuous understanding of how your resources are being utilized.
Without visibility into your resource usage, you may find yourself either over-provisioning or under-provisioning, both of which can lead to higher costs. Resource monitoring and visibility tools are essential for tracking your GKE environment’s performance and ensuring that you’re always operating at peak efficiency.
Here’s a closer look at how you can leverage monitoring tools for GKE cost optimization:
Prometheus and Grafana are two of the most commonly used open-source tools for monitoring Kubernetes environments. Prometheus collects and stores metrics from your GKE clusters, while Grafana visualizes these metrics in easy-to-read dashboards.
Together, they provide real-time insights into the health and performance of your applications and infrastructure.
By using Prometheus and Grafana, you can track how your applications consume resources over time. This helps you identify opportunities for optimization by pinpointing underutilized or overutilized resources, which directly affects your GKE costs.
Once you’ve established continuous monitoring with tools like Prometheus and Grafana, the next step is to adjust your resources based on these tools' data. Any adjustments to CPU or memory requests may be arbitrary without metrics, leading to wasted resources or performance issues.
For example, you might notice that during off-peak hours, certain Pods consume significantly fewer resources. In response, you could implement autoscaling strategies to reduce resource allocation during these times, saving costs without affecting performance.
Monitoring isn’t just about tracking resources; it’s a key part of cost optimization. Without the right visibility, it’s nearly impossible to understand where you can make savings in your GKE environment. By monitoring resource usage continuously, you can:
In short, monitoring provides the insights you need to make informed decisions on resource allocation, ensuring that you're not paying for more than you need while maintaining optimal performance.
While Prometheus and Grafana provide powerful insights, manually interpreting and acting on these insights can be time-consuming and prone to error. That’s where Sedai comes in. Sedai is an autonomous cloud cost optimization platform that works in conjunction with your existing monitoring tools to provide real-time adjustments based on actual usage.
Sedai takes resource metrics from your monitoring tools and automatically adjusts your GKE clusters to reduce costs without compromising performance. Here’s how Sedai helps optimize GKE costs:
To know more: Using Kubernetes Autoscalers to Optimize for Cost and Performance
With Sedai’s autonomous optimization capabilities, you can maintain full control over your GKE costs while benefiting from the platform’s smart, data-driven decision-making.
Link: Introducing granular cost insights for GKE
To optimize costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), it's crucial to have clear visibility into your cloud spending. Without effective monitoring and cost management practices, it's easy for expenses to spiral out of control, especially in a dynamic environment like GKE, where resources can quickly scale up. Here's how you can enhance cost visibility and monitor your GKE expenses more effectively:
One of the first steps in gaining control over your cloud spending is to set up budgets and cost allocation tags. These mechanisms help you track where your GKE resources are being used and how much they cost.
By tagging your resources appropriately and establishing clear budgets, you can isolate which teams, projects, or services are consuming the most resources and adjust accordingly.
Google Cloud Platform provides two primary ways to manage your budgets and set up cost alerts: via the GCP Console or using the GCP Command-Line Interface (CLI). Here's how to set them up:
bash
gcloud beta billing budgets create \
gcloud beta billing budgets create \
--billing-account "YOUR_BILLING_ACCOUNT_ID" \
--display-name "GKE Optimization Budget" \
--amount "100" \
--threshold-rule "90" \
--notification-channels "YOUR_NOTIFICATION_EMAIL"
This command sets a budget of $100 for your GKE usage, with an alert triggered when the spending reaches 90% of the budget.
To track costs more accurately, it’s essential to label your Kubernetes Pods for cost allocation. GCP can then track these labels, enabling you to break down your expenses by specific workloads or teams. You can label Pods directly in your deployment YAML or update existing deployments to include cost allocation labels.
Here’s an example of how you can label your Pods for cost allocation:
1. Update your Kubernetes deployment YAML file to include cost-related labels:
yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
team: engineering
environment: production
cost-center: gke-cost-optimization
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app-container
image: my-app-image
resources:
requests:
memory: "1Gi"
cpu: "1"
limits:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "2"
In this example, the cost-center label is used to assign a unique identifier to the resources used by this specific workload, making it easier to track its associated costs in the GCP Console.
2. If you’re using the kubectl CLI, you can label your existing Pods by running the following command:
bash
kubectl label pod my-pod cost-center=gke-cost-optimization
This command assigns the cost-center=gke-cost-optimization label to the specified pod. When combined with your cost allocation setup in GCP, it enables better tracking of costs for that specific workload.
By assigning labels to your Pods, you can get a granular view of how specific services or teams are driving your GKE costs. This makes it easier to pinpoint areas where savings can be made and which parts of your infrastructure require optimization.
Incorporating proper cost visibility and monitoring into your GKE environment is essential for staying on top of your cloud expenses. By setting budgets, using alerts, and applying cost allocation tags, you can get a detailed view of where your money is going and take proactive steps to manage costs effectively. Tracking costs at the Pod level ensures that you have the right tools in place to optimize for cost in GKE.
Optimizing costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is not just about reducing expenses—it’s about making sure your cloud resources are used efficiently without compromising performance.
Throughout this guide, we’ve covered key best practices on how to optimize for cost in GKE, including adjusting Pod requests and limits, choosing the right machine types, leveraging autoscaling, and implementing automation tools like Sedai.
Sustainable cost efficiency requires a proactive approach—regularly reviewing usage patterns, right-sizing resources, and using discounts like Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) and Spot VMs where applicable.
However, cost savings should never come at the expense of application performance and reliability. Ensuring that your workloads remain stable while minimizing waste is crucial to maintaining an optimized and cost-effective GKE environment.
By continuously refining their cost management strategies and integrating autonomous optimization solutions like Sedai, businesses can maximize the value of their Kubernetes investment while keeping cloud spending under control. Don’t leave money on the table—book a consultation now and see how Sedai can help you achieve maximum savings while keeping performance high.
Answer:To optimize GKE costs, focus on right-sizing your Kubernetes resources, such as adjusting pod requests and limits, to avoid over-provisioning. Use autoscaling to automatically adjust resources based on demand and leverage Spot VMs for non-critical workloads.
Additionally, explore committed use discounts (CUDs) and sustained use discounts (SUDs) to reduce long-term costs. Tools like Sedai can also help automate the entire process for ongoing optimization.
Answer: The key is to balance resource allocation and scaling mechanisms. Adjust pod resource requests to more accurately reflect actual usage and make sure autoscaling is fine-tuned.
For instance, use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) for load-driven scaling and Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) for adjusting resource requests based on observed usage. Additionally, employing Spot VMs for non-critical tasks can keep costs down without impacting core application performance.
Answer:Autoscaling allows GKE to automatically adjust the number of nodes or pods based on demand, ensuring you only pay for what you need. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) scales the number of pods, while Cluster Autoscaler adjusts the node count.
By fine-tuning autoscaling policies, you reduce over-provisioning and lower costs during periods of low demand, all while maintaining application availability and performance.
Answer:Yes, Spot VMs can save up to 90% compared to on-demand instances, making them a great choice for workloads that can tolerate interruptions. For example, background processing jobs, batch workloads, or non-time-critical tasks are ideal candidates for Spot VMs.
However, you should have a strategy in place to handle potential interruptions (such as using Sedai for automation) to ensure that workloads are efficiently rescheduled when instances are reclaimed.
Answer: Sedai takes a proactive, autonomous approach to GKE cost optimization by continuously monitoring workloads and making real-time adjustments. Unlike traditional methods, where cost management is reactive or manually intensive, Sedai’s AI-driven automation dynamically adjusts resources to match actual demand, ensuring that your cloud environment remains cost-efficient without sacrificing performance. This method reduces human error and avoids overspending, delivering more consistent savings over time.
March 10, 2025
March 10, 2025
Running workloads on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) offers incredible flexibility, scalability, and the ability to manage complex, containerized applications. However, with this freedom comes the challenge of cost management. As workloads scale, the associated costs can quickly spiral, particularly if the resources aren’t optimally configured.
Understanding how to optimize for cost in GKE is crucial for businesses looking to achieve efficient cloud operations without compromising performance or scalability. Without a solid cost optimization strategy, organizations risk overspending on unused resources, inefficient autoscaling, and underutilized virtual machines (VMs).
By optimizing GKE costs, you not only reduce unnecessary expenditures but also free up valuable resources for other areas of your business. Efficient cloud cost management ensures that your Kubernetes deployments are running as economically as possible while still maintaining the performance required to support your operations.
With various pricing models, including pay-as-you-go, committed use discounts, and spot VMs, there are many ways to reduce cloud expenses and make sure you're getting the most out of every dollar spent.
In the following sections, we'll explore effective strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE, including choosing the right VM types, utilizing autoscaling features, and leveraging cloud discounts, all while maintaining a smooth, efficient Kubernetes environment.
Link: Best practices for running cost-optimized Kubernetes applications on GKE
One of the most effective ways to optimize costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is by adjusting the Pod requests and limits. These settings determine the amount of CPU and memory resources that Kubernetes allocates for each container. Misconfigured requests and limits can lead to underutilization of resources or, conversely, cause excessive over-provisioning, both of which can inflate your GKE costs.
Here’s a detailed approach on how to adjust these settings for better cost efficiency:
The first step in optimizing Pod resources is updating the Kubernetes deployment YAML files, which define the resource allocation for your containers. By refining the requests and limits, you ensure that GKE can more accurately allocate the resources your workloads need.
The resources field within the YAML file defines these parameters. Specifically, the requests field determines the amount of CPU and memory Kubernetes will reserve for a container, while the limits field sets the maximum allowable amount of CPU and memory.
For example:
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app-container
image: my-app-image
resources:
requests:
memory: "500Mi"
cpu: "500m"
limits:
memory: "1Gi"
cpu: "1"
In this configuration, Kubernetes will reserve 500Mi of memory and 500m (0.5 CPUs) for the container, but the container will be able to use up to 1Gi of memory and 1 CPU if necessary.
To effectively optimize costs in GKE, fine-tuning these resource requests and limits based on actual usage is key. Here are some best practices for adjusting these settings:
Consider an example where an application initially had the following resource requests and limits:
yaml
resources:
requests:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "1"
limits:
memory: "3Gi"
cpu: "2"
After analyzing resource usage, you notice that the application typically uses about 1.5Gi of memory and 0.75 CPU. Based on this observation, you can reduce the request and limit values as follows:
yaml
resources:
requests:
memory: "1.5Gi"
cpu: "0.75"
limits:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "1.5"
This adjustment reflects the actual usage of the application, thus helping you avoid over-provisioning while still ensuring the application runs smoothly.
Manual adjustments can work, but the dynamic nature of workloads often makes it difficult to maintain the right balance over time. This is where Sedai comes into play. Sedai is a cloud cost optimization platform that can autonomously adjust Kubernetes resource allocations based on real-time demand, eliminating the need for constant manual intervention.
By integrating Sedai with your GKE environment, you introduce AI-driven autonomy to the adjustment of pod requests and limits. Sedai continuously monitors usage and adjusts resources intelligently, ensuring that your GKE workloads always use the optimal amount of CPU and memory without under or over-provisioning.
With Sedai’s ability to automatically scale and adjust resource allocations in real time, you can ensure that your GKE costs remain optimized while maintaining the performance and availability of your applications. This level of autonomy significantly reduces the risk of human error and ensures that your infrastructure adapts to the fluctuating needs of your workload.
Autoscaling is one of the most effective ways to optimize costs in GKE, ensuring you only use the resources you need at any given time. Without autoscaling, workloads can be over-provisioned, leading to unnecessary cloud expenses or under-provisioned, causing performance issues.
By implementing autoscaling, you can dynamically adjust the number of pods, their resource allocations, and the overall cluster size based on real-time demand. Below are the key autoscaling mechanisms available in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and how they help optimize costs.
GKE provides three primary types of autoscaling to manage workload resource consumption efficiently:
Each of these autoscaling mechanisms plays a crucial role in ensuring that your cluster scales appropriately without wasting cloud resources.
HPA automatically increases or decreases the number of pods in a deployment based on CPU or other utilization metrics. This prevents idle resources from running unnecessarily while ensuring that applications scale up when demand increases.
You can configure HPA using the following command:
sh
kubectl autoscale deployment my-app --cpu-percent=50 --min=1 --max=10
This command configures autoscaling for a deployment named my-app, adjusting the number of pods between 1 and 10 based on CPU utilization (targeting 50% usage).
VPA optimizes the CPU and memory requests of pods by analyzing historical usage patterns. Instead of scaling the number of pods, it adjusts resource allocations within existing pods.
VPA can be enabled using the following command:
sh
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/deploy/vpa-v1-crd-gen.yaml
Once enabled, it automatically adjusts pod resource requests based on real-time and historical usage.
Unlike HPA and VPA, which manage pod-level scaling, Cluster Autoscaler (CA) ensures that your cluster always has the right number of nodes to run workloads. If there are unscheduled pods due to resource constraints, CA automatically provisions new nodes. Conversely, it removes underutilized nodes to cut costs.
Use the following command to enable Cluster Autoscaler:
sh
gcloud container clusters update my-cluster \
--enable-autoscaling \
--min-nodes=1 \
--max-nodes=5 \
--node-pool my-node-pool
This command configures the cluster my-cluster to scale between 1 and 5 nodes based on resource demand.
While HPA, VPA, and CA provide excellent autoscaling capabilities, manual configurations can still leave room for inefficiencies. Sedai takes autoscaling to the next level by introducing autonomous optimization, ensuring that workloads and clusters are always at their most efficient state.
By integrating Sedai, organizations can achieve autonomous scaling, eliminating the need for constant manual tuning and ensuring that GKE resources are used efficiently at all times.
Link: How to optimize cloud costs with Committed Use Discounts for Compute Engine
One of the most effective strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE is to take advantage of Google Cloud’s pricing models and discounts. By aligning your workloads with the right cost-saving options, you can significantly reduce cloud expenses without compromising performance. GKE offers multiple ways to optimize pricing, including Committed Use Discounts (CUDs), Spot Virtual Machines (Spot VMs), and Sustained Use Discounts (SUDs).
Let’s break down these options and explore how you can maximize cost savings.
Google Cloud’s Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) allow businesses to commit to using a certain amount of compute resources for a 1- or 3-year period in exchange for significant discounts. Unlike pay-as-you-go pricing, where you pay for resources based on actual usage, CUDs offer predictable, lower costs for businesses with steady workloads.
There are two types of CUDs:
While CUDs provide substantial savings, they lack flexibility—if your computing requirements change, you may end up paying for unused capacity.
This is where Sedai’s autonomous cost optimization can help. By analyzing workload demand patterns, Sedai can dynamically adjust usage and ensure you maximize CUD benefits without overcommitting.
For workloads that don’t require high availability, Spot Virtual Machines (Spot VMs) provide an opportunity to save up to 60-91% compared to standard VM pricing. Spot VMs use Google’s spare cloud capacity, making them highly cost-effective for non-critical, fault-tolerant workloads.
Considerations before using Spot VMs:
Spot VMs are an excellent choice for cost-conscious teams looking to run batch processing, data analytics, or AI/ML training while keeping expenses low.
Sustained Use Discounts (SUDs) provide automatic savings for running compute resources continuously over a billing cycle. The longer your workloads run, the greater the discount you receive on incremental usage.
How Sustained Use Discounts work:
Link: Why separate your Kubernetes workload with nodepool segregation and affinity options
Node pools play a crucial role in managing Kubernetes workloads efficiently, and optimizing their configuration is key to reducing unnecessary costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). If node pools are not properly managed, organizations often face resource wastage, underutilized nodes, and inflated cloud bills. By optimizing node pool management, you can significantly improve resource allocation, reduce spending, and maintain performance.
In this section, we’ll explore strategies for how to optimize for cost in GKE by configuring node pools effectively.
A single, uniform node pool for all workloads often results in resource wastage. Instead, creating multiple node pools based on workload characteristics helps optimize cost and resource allocation.
Best practices for managing multiple node pools:
Example node pool creation command:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create high-memory-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=n2-highmem-4 \
--num-nodes=2
This command creates a node pool with high-memory nodes for workloads that need additional RAM, preventing memory shortages and improving performance.
When configuring node pools, selecting the right instance types and sizing them appropriately is key to controlling costs. GKE offers various machine types under different families, each optimized for different workloads.
Key configuration options to optimize cost:
For example, you can create a cost-efficient node pool using E2 instances:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create cost-efficient-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=e2-standard-4 \
--num-nodes=3
By selecting the right node configurations, you ensure that workloads get precisely the resources they need—without overpaying for unnecessary computing power.
Preemptible Virtual Machines (PVMs) provide up to 91% savings compared to regular Compute Engine VMs. These temporary instances are ideal for batch jobs, non-critical workloads, and applications that can tolerate interruptions.
Example command to create a node pool with preemptible VMs:
sh
gcloud container node-pools create preemptible-pool \
--cluster=my-cluster \
--machine-type=e2-standard-2 \
--num-nodes=5 \
--preemptible
This configuration ensures that GKE will automatically scale these lower-cost instances up and down based on demand, keeping costs under control.
Important Considerations:
While manually optimizing node pools can yield cost savings, it often requires continuous monitoring and adjustments. This is where Sedai’s autonomous optimization can take cost management to the next level.
By integrating Sedai, organizations can eliminate inefficiencies in node pool management, reduce manual efforts, and optimize GKE costs proactively.
To Know More: Kubernetes Cost: EKS vs AKS vs GKE
Link: Use GKE usage metering to combat over-provisioning
Effective GKE cost optimization relies on more than just adjusting resource requests and limits—it requires a continuous understanding of how your resources are being utilized.
Without visibility into your resource usage, you may find yourself either over-provisioning or under-provisioning, both of which can lead to higher costs. Resource monitoring and visibility tools are essential for tracking your GKE environment’s performance and ensuring that you’re always operating at peak efficiency.
Here’s a closer look at how you can leverage monitoring tools for GKE cost optimization:
Prometheus and Grafana are two of the most commonly used open-source tools for monitoring Kubernetes environments. Prometheus collects and stores metrics from your GKE clusters, while Grafana visualizes these metrics in easy-to-read dashboards.
Together, they provide real-time insights into the health and performance of your applications and infrastructure.
By using Prometheus and Grafana, you can track how your applications consume resources over time. This helps you identify opportunities for optimization by pinpointing underutilized or overutilized resources, which directly affects your GKE costs.
Once you’ve established continuous monitoring with tools like Prometheus and Grafana, the next step is to adjust your resources based on these tools' data. Any adjustments to CPU or memory requests may be arbitrary without metrics, leading to wasted resources or performance issues.
For example, you might notice that during off-peak hours, certain Pods consume significantly fewer resources. In response, you could implement autoscaling strategies to reduce resource allocation during these times, saving costs without affecting performance.
Monitoring isn’t just about tracking resources; it’s a key part of cost optimization. Without the right visibility, it’s nearly impossible to understand where you can make savings in your GKE environment. By monitoring resource usage continuously, you can:
In short, monitoring provides the insights you need to make informed decisions on resource allocation, ensuring that you're not paying for more than you need while maintaining optimal performance.
While Prometheus and Grafana provide powerful insights, manually interpreting and acting on these insights can be time-consuming and prone to error. That’s where Sedai comes in. Sedai is an autonomous cloud cost optimization platform that works in conjunction with your existing monitoring tools to provide real-time adjustments based on actual usage.
Sedai takes resource metrics from your monitoring tools and automatically adjusts your GKE clusters to reduce costs without compromising performance. Here’s how Sedai helps optimize GKE costs:
To know more: Using Kubernetes Autoscalers to Optimize for Cost and Performance
With Sedai’s autonomous optimization capabilities, you can maintain full control over your GKE costs while benefiting from the platform’s smart, data-driven decision-making.
Link: Introducing granular cost insights for GKE
To optimize costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), it's crucial to have clear visibility into your cloud spending. Without effective monitoring and cost management practices, it's easy for expenses to spiral out of control, especially in a dynamic environment like GKE, where resources can quickly scale up. Here's how you can enhance cost visibility and monitor your GKE expenses more effectively:
One of the first steps in gaining control over your cloud spending is to set up budgets and cost allocation tags. These mechanisms help you track where your GKE resources are being used and how much they cost.
By tagging your resources appropriately and establishing clear budgets, you can isolate which teams, projects, or services are consuming the most resources and adjust accordingly.
Google Cloud Platform provides two primary ways to manage your budgets and set up cost alerts: via the GCP Console or using the GCP Command-Line Interface (CLI). Here's how to set them up:
bash
gcloud beta billing budgets create \
gcloud beta billing budgets create \
--billing-account "YOUR_BILLING_ACCOUNT_ID" \
--display-name "GKE Optimization Budget" \
--amount "100" \
--threshold-rule "90" \
--notification-channels "YOUR_NOTIFICATION_EMAIL"
This command sets a budget of $100 for your GKE usage, with an alert triggered when the spending reaches 90% of the budget.
To track costs more accurately, it’s essential to label your Kubernetes Pods for cost allocation. GCP can then track these labels, enabling you to break down your expenses by specific workloads or teams. You can label Pods directly in your deployment YAML or update existing deployments to include cost allocation labels.
Here’s an example of how you can label your Pods for cost allocation:
1. Update your Kubernetes deployment YAML file to include cost-related labels:
yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-app
spec:
replicas: 3
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-app
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-app
team: engineering
environment: production
cost-center: gke-cost-optimization
spec:
containers:
- name: my-app-container
image: my-app-image
resources:
requests:
memory: "1Gi"
cpu: "1"
limits:
memory: "2Gi"
cpu: "2"
In this example, the cost-center label is used to assign a unique identifier to the resources used by this specific workload, making it easier to track its associated costs in the GCP Console.
2. If you’re using the kubectl CLI, you can label your existing Pods by running the following command:
bash
kubectl label pod my-pod cost-center=gke-cost-optimization
This command assigns the cost-center=gke-cost-optimization label to the specified pod. When combined with your cost allocation setup in GCP, it enables better tracking of costs for that specific workload.
By assigning labels to your Pods, you can get a granular view of how specific services or teams are driving your GKE costs. This makes it easier to pinpoint areas where savings can be made and which parts of your infrastructure require optimization.
Incorporating proper cost visibility and monitoring into your GKE environment is essential for staying on top of your cloud expenses. By setting budgets, using alerts, and applying cost allocation tags, you can get a detailed view of where your money is going and take proactive steps to manage costs effectively. Tracking costs at the Pod level ensures that you have the right tools in place to optimize for cost in GKE.
Optimizing costs in Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is not just about reducing expenses—it’s about making sure your cloud resources are used efficiently without compromising performance.
Throughout this guide, we’ve covered key best practices on how to optimize for cost in GKE, including adjusting Pod requests and limits, choosing the right machine types, leveraging autoscaling, and implementing automation tools like Sedai.
Sustainable cost efficiency requires a proactive approach—regularly reviewing usage patterns, right-sizing resources, and using discounts like Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) and Spot VMs where applicable.
However, cost savings should never come at the expense of application performance and reliability. Ensuring that your workloads remain stable while minimizing waste is crucial to maintaining an optimized and cost-effective GKE environment.
By continuously refining their cost management strategies and integrating autonomous optimization solutions like Sedai, businesses can maximize the value of their Kubernetes investment while keeping cloud spending under control. Don’t leave money on the table—book a consultation now and see how Sedai can help you achieve maximum savings while keeping performance high.
Answer:To optimize GKE costs, focus on right-sizing your Kubernetes resources, such as adjusting pod requests and limits, to avoid over-provisioning. Use autoscaling to automatically adjust resources based on demand and leverage Spot VMs for non-critical workloads.
Additionally, explore committed use discounts (CUDs) and sustained use discounts (SUDs) to reduce long-term costs. Tools like Sedai can also help automate the entire process for ongoing optimization.
Answer: The key is to balance resource allocation and scaling mechanisms. Adjust pod resource requests to more accurately reflect actual usage and make sure autoscaling is fine-tuned.
For instance, use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) for load-driven scaling and Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) for adjusting resource requests based on observed usage. Additionally, employing Spot VMs for non-critical tasks can keep costs down without impacting core application performance.
Answer:Autoscaling allows GKE to automatically adjust the number of nodes or pods based on demand, ensuring you only pay for what you need. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) scales the number of pods, while Cluster Autoscaler adjusts the node count.
By fine-tuning autoscaling policies, you reduce over-provisioning and lower costs during periods of low demand, all while maintaining application availability and performance.
Answer:Yes, Spot VMs can save up to 90% compared to on-demand instances, making them a great choice for workloads that can tolerate interruptions. For example, background processing jobs, batch workloads, or non-time-critical tasks are ideal candidates for Spot VMs.
However, you should have a strategy in place to handle potential interruptions (such as using Sedai for automation) to ensure that workloads are efficiently rescheduled when instances are reclaimed.
Answer: Sedai takes a proactive, autonomous approach to GKE cost optimization by continuously monitoring workloads and making real-time adjustments. Unlike traditional methods, where cost management is reactive or manually intensive, Sedai’s AI-driven automation dynamically adjusts resources to match actual demand, ensuring that your cloud environment remains cost-efficient without sacrificing performance. This method reduces human error and avoids overspending, delivering more consistent savings over time.